Who’s Indimidating Who? The Creation-Science Debate

I recently read two books on Bible and science issues.  One was the summary of RATE research by Dr. Don DeYoung, Thousands…Not Billions, which spoke in favor of detailed scientific support for a young age for the earth (with which I agree).  I was refreshed by the honest spirit I found.  At points where the evidence supported a young earth but also left further challenges in different directions, DeYoung did not duck the question and admitted the need for further research by young earth scientists.  He also couched his statements in terms of absolutes when he thought things were clear but in probabilistic terminology when young earth conclusions could be held but the evidence did not rule out other interpretations automatically.

The other book I just finished is Francis Collins’ book The Language of Love.  Collins is the somewhat famous head of the government genome project.  He is also one of the founders of BioLogos, an organization dedicated to propagating the position of theistic evolution.  It seemed for the most part to be a book recycling the old argument that similarity implies common ancestry biologically speaking.  It just adds the detailed information of the human and animal DNA to the argument.

One of the interesting comments I found by Collins was the following:  “While many scientists ascribe to TE [theistic evolution], they are in general reluctant to speak out for fear of negative reaction from their scientific peers, or perhaps for fear of criticism from the theological community” (p. 202).  While I can accept this concern to some degree, I find the concern to be somewhat puny next to the same concern for young earth creationists who are scientists or even those old earth creationists who don’t believe in evolution.  I have a friend who teaches in the sciences in a major state univeristy.  He once confided that he could lose his job if he became vocal about his rejection of evolution.  There are many qualified scientists who reject Darwin’s theory and who keep quite for fear of their jobs.  Also, there are many educational and research institiutions that would never hire a young earth creationist.  This seems to contradict the fact that the same crowd who rejects such people also seems to trumpet pluralism and invoke it when necessay to get their viewpoints across or put other viewpoints down.  All in all, who is trying to intimidate who?

God Bless the U.S.A.

On this day of July 4, 2011, I thought it fitting for me to make some comments on the United States of America, the nation of which I am a citizen due to God’s providence.  I am proud to be an American although there are many who live here in these days who do not voice the same posture and appreciation.

Earlier this year, I read Peter Lillback’s Sacred Fire on George Washington.  I came away with a greater appreciation for the Christian character and virtue of the father of our country.  Then I read A. Lincoln by Ronald White which did the same for my respect of the other of the two great presidents by most reckoning, although Christian faith seemed to play less of a role in Lincoln’s life than in Washington’s.  Now I am reading A Patriot’s History of the United States by Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen.  It is a history of America from a conservative point of view.  It does not treat America as a bad idea.  I am about a hundred pages in.  It is refreshing in that, unlike many histories, it tells a holistic picture.  One example is the handling of the Spanish conquests of the Aztecs.  While it is often portrayed in unbalanced histories that all or most Indian populations in North and South American before the white man came were peaceful, A Patriot’s History shows the ruthless character of the Aztec rulers toward their own people (they murdered tens of thousands).  While not justifying the Spanish abuse of them, it shows what the prophet Habakkuk taught — God sometimes uses a wicked people to judge another wicked people.

While I am a Christian first and then an American, I support my country without holding an “America right or wrong” approach.  But to commemorate this birthday of my great nation, I listened to Alan Jackson’s “Where Were You When the World Stopped Turning” and Lee Greenwood’s “God Bless the U.S.A.”  I also watched a couple of movies heralding some past heroes from the Revolutionary War days.  Then I prayed for God’s continued blessing upon our nation and wisdom for our leaders.  I ask all Americans to join me in this prayer.

A Young Earth and God’s Alleged Deception

Before I took the turn in my life into Christian ministry as a pastor and seminary educator, I was an aerospace engineer.  I worked on the space shuttle briefly as an intern as a senior in college (back before they built it).  I did most of my work on missile defense systems and especially the F-16 jet fighter.  I have a largely intellectual approach to my faith and have never relinquished my love for scientific method and the field of the sciences in particular.  Early on in my Christian life I became convinced of the young earth approach to harmonizing the Bible and so-called scientific discoveries and teachings.  I have always believed that I can do that with a clear conscience and without surrendering my mind and rational thought.

While I was a seminary student at Liberty Baptist Seminary in the late 1970s, I had a conversation with Dr. Lane Lester, who had come to teach at Liberty Baptist College (now Liberty University) about the problem of God’s deception.  If God made the universe with apparent age (stretched out the light rays, etc.), then the things that we discover through our telescopes right now bring a dilemma to our attention.  The mechanics of the universe (speed of light, etc.) point to what we are seeing as having happened billions of years ago.  The young earth position says that what we are seeing did not exist billions of years ago since the earth is only 6000 to 10,000 years old.  Thus, God actually is deceiving us by the way that he designed things and perhaps the deception is ongoing.  Dr. Lester raised this question to me.  I am not sure that I had ever thought about it seriously before that time.  My initial thought was that God did not have to reveal all of his “mechanics” to us naturally.  He has communicated to us in other ways of special revelation.  If we accept the other ways God is communcating to us, we should not have a problem of God creating the universe with apparent age.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tornadoes, Fear, Social Action, and Apologetics

I am originally from Alabama, in particular, from Huntsville in the northern part of the state although as a small child I also lived in Eufaula in the southern part of the state.   I watched with horror as the reports came in about the tornadoes that ravaged the state and other states in late April (and in Missouri and other parts just a couple of days ago).  I saw the video of the large tornado going through Tuscaloosa.  After several days of trying to get ahold of my friends in Hunstville (I have no family there any more), I finally talked to some of them the week after.  One of my pastor friends, Rick Johnson, told me that nine tornadoes came through Huntsville that day and he saw two of them himself from his house.  Another close friend, Dr. Sam Wolfe, who helped lead me to Christ in 1974, told me that a subdivision not far from him had been totally demolished.  The picture on the left below is a picture of one of the tornadoes that went through Huntsville.  On the right is a picture of the tornado in Tuscaloosa for which most of the nation saw the video.

Read the rest of this entry »

King James I

I recently completed reading a fun book —  Majestie: The King Behind the King James Bible by David Teems (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2010).  It comes at a time (400-yr anniversary) when many are appropriately examining the time period and substance of the English translation of the King James Version of the Bible.  From a biblical point of view, one would have to say that the assessment of the spirituality of King James is quite lacking and any judgment of his “born again” status left in confusion.  The book does not really go into these features in much detail.  I do not know much about Teems and his background although I browsed the web for information.  But the book is a delightful read and puts the spotlight on early 17th century England in a way that you will remember.

Abraham Lincoln and Charles Finney

After reading the monumental work on George Washington, Sacred Fire, I have turned my attention to the other of the greatest presidents by public reckoning — Abraham Lincoln.  In the study I am reading A. Lincoln: A Biography by Ronald C. White, Jr.  I will probably make a few posts along the way.  My initial impressions of the work are positive.  The documentation and detail seems to be adequate and the writing easy to follow.  It comes with high marks from several reputable sources.

Here I want to mention what is an anomaly or oddity that I have found in White’s work.  On pages 296-97, White summarizes: 

“In Ohio, a contentious issue was the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.  The controversy was raised to a fever pitch in the fall of 1858 when a federal marshal arrested John Price, a slave who had lived in Oberlin for some time.  Residents of Oberlin stormed the hotel in nearby Wellington where Price was being held, freed him, and took him back to Oberlin, where the president of Oberlin College hid him in his home before friends spirited him away to Canada.”  (emphasis added)

What is perplexing is the absence of the name of the president of Oberlin College — none other than Charles Finney, who served as Oberlin’s president from 1851-1866.  Throughout the book, White mentions many pastors and preachers, some obscure, who figure into the narrative he is presenting of Lincoln and his times.  However, here he fails to mention one of the most famous revivalists of his day, who was also an ardent abolitionist.  I wonder why the lack of mention of Finney.

Music Postings

One of my hobbies over the years has been guitar playing & songwriting.  I have finally put a little history down on how that has worked in my life.  You can check it out under the music tool bar option on my blog site.  I have also listed the songs of my published CD “No More Tears” with a short description of each song and for a few of them the actual recording.  I have further links to add to the section on the songs giving a detailed theological commentary on the words of the songs but those are not yet ready to post.

Scripture, Truth, Culture and “Love Wins”

Last January I gave a lectureship (3 messages) at Appalachian Bible College in West Virginia on hermeneutics mostly in light of postmodern culture.  The overall theme of the lectureship was “Scripture, Truth, and Culture.”  The first message entitled “Jesus and Truth” was an exposition of Matthew 22 showing that our Savior does not talk, act, or live like a postmodernist.  The second message entitled “Paul and Truth” was an exposition of Acts 17 (Paul at Mars Hill) showing that the great apostle does not talk, act, or live like a postmodernist.  My third message was “Dispensationalism and Truth” where I discussed the dispensational philosophy of history.

I was asked to cover some of the same material in an unnamed lectureship at my own school, Baptist Bible College & Seminary recently April 12-14, 2011.  The first two messages are the same as the first two at Appalachian Bible College.  For the third message, I was asked to do a book critique of Rob Bell’s recent book Love Wins.  The audio of the messages, manuscripts of the first two messages, and PowerPoints used for all three messages can be found at http://www.bbc.edu/chapel/mike_stallard.asp.

George Washington and Debt

We in the United States are in a debate for our fiscal soul.  But it is also a moral question whether we squander our wealth and leave our grandchildren with great debt and a country in shambles.  With this in mind, I have been reading (as I have posted a couple of times) Peter Lillback’s Sacred Fire which proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that George Washington was a genuine Christian and not a deist.  In the recorded Farewell Address by Washington, our first president made some comments that our current government leaders need to hear about debt:

“As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit.  One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible: avoiding occasions of expence by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumultion of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expence, but  by vigorous exertions in time of Peace to discharge the Debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burthen which we ourselves ought to bear.  The execution of these maxims belongs to your Representatives, but it is necessary that public opinion should cooperate.”  (p. 878)

Looking at this statement, I think it is quite easy to see how Washington would vote and lead if he were alive today.  It appears to be a direction different than our current President and many government leaders.  It may also be unfortunate that public opinion is not strongly in the direction Washington lays out.

Blog Changes

I have been silent for about a month on my blog site.  The reason is not a lack of things to talk about.  My blog has been in the process of moving to a new host server.  I should be back in the swing of things shortly.